Operational Assessment of Shell and Tube High Pressure Heater in PT Sumber Segara Primadaya's 300 MW Unit 2 Power Plant

Authors

  • Mulyono Mulyono Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Semarang, Semarang 50275, Indonesia
  • Erwan Tri Efendi Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Semarang, Semarang 50275, Indonesia
  • Rayhan Muhammad Faqi Fikar Setiyawan Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Semarang, Semarang 50275, Indonesia
  • Dianisa Khoirum Sandi Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Semarang, Semarang 50275, Indonesia
  • Dhiyaussalam Dhiyaussalam Department of Electrical Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Banjarmasin, Banjarmasin, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32497/eksergi.v21i01.6361

Keywords:

High-pressure heater, shell-and-tube heat exchanger, thermal efficiency, PLTU

Abstract

Electricity is a fundamental necessity, with Indonesia's per capita consumption reaching 1.73 kWh/capita in 2022—a 4% increase from 2021 and the highest in five decades. Projections indicate demand will surge to 1,885 TWh by 2060, with per capita consumption exceeding 5,000 kWh, underscoring the need for efficient power generation. In coal-fired power plants (PLTU), high-pressure shell-and-tube heat exchangers are critical for optimizing efficiency, recovering waste heat to preheat boiler feedwater, reducing fuel use by 5–10%, and minimizing emissions. This study evaluates the performance of these heat exchangers at PT Sumber Segara Primadaya PLTU Cilacap, a major Indonesian PLTU with units totaling 2,260 MW capacity. By analyzing operational effectiveness, this research aims to enhance maintenance strategies and maximize energy output, supporting Indonesia's growing electricity demands while improving thermal efficiency in coal-dependent power systems.

References

10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110183.

[10] J. H. Kim, M. M. Song, and S. A. Alameri, “Emerging areas of nuclear power applications,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 354, p. 110183, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110183.

[11] Y. Sui and W. Wu, “Ionic liquid screening and performance optimization of transcritical carbon dioxide absorption heat pump enhanced by expander,” Energy, vol. 263, p. 125689, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125689.

[12] D. Zhang, X. Han, H. Wang, Q. Yang, and J. Yan, “Experimental study on transient heat/mass transfer characteristics during static flash of aqueous NaCl solution,” Int J Heat Mass Transf, vol. 152, p. 119543, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119543.

[13] Z. Chu, K. Dong, P. Gao, Y. Wang, and Q. Sun, “Mine-oriented low-enthalpy geothermal exploitation: A review from spatio-temporal perspective,” Energy Convers Manag, vol. 237, p. 114123, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114123.

[14] S. Lee, T. kyun Kim, C. min Park, M. Hwan Kim, and H. Jo, “The effect of heater dimensions with different liquid penetration lengths to dry spots on critical heat flux,” Appl Therm Eng, vol. 213, p. 118754, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.118754.

[15] M. Misale and J. A. Bocanegra, “Experiments and qualitative analysis by artificial neural network approach on pool boiling of FC-72 on finned surfaces confined by an unheated horizontal wall,” International Journal of Thermal Sciences, vol. 187, p. 108105, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2022.108105.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-27