A Comparative Analysis of Epoxy Coating Quality on ASTM AH-36 Steel Plates Using Surface Preparation Methods

Authors

  • Rahmat Hidayat Universitas Pertahanan https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8406-1633
  • Rando Tungga Dewa Universitas Pertahanan
  • Thaha Yassin Ramadhan Utomo Universitas Pertahanan
  • Muhammad Rizky Universitas Pertahanan
  • Mariyan Maritza Ramadhan Universitas Pertahanan
  • Leander Berliano Farel Kristiyono Universitas Pertahanan
  • Ainur Rofiq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32497/jrm.v21i1.7507

Keywords:

Shipping Industry, Adhesion Strength, Corrosion, Epoxy Coating, Surface Preparation

Abstract

The shipping industry, vital to the global economy, faces significant challenges due to corrosion in marine environments, particularly affecting steel structures like AH36 grade used in ships. This study investigates the effectiveness of two surface preparation methods—Abrasive Blast Cleaning and Power Tool Cleaning—on the adhesion of epoxy coatings, which are essential for enhancing corrosion resistance. Employing ASTM standards, we assessed surface roughness and adhesion strength, revealing that Abrasive Blast Cleaning produced a superior average roughness of 106.34 µm compared to 17.67 µm from Power Tool Cleaning. The Tape X-Cut test further demonstrated that the former achieved a perfect adhesion rating of 5A, while the latter only reached 4A, indicating slight peeling. These findings underscore the critical role of surface preparation in optimizing coating performance, suggesting that adopting Abrasive Blast Cleaning can significantly extend the lifespan and operational efficiency of both commercial and military vessels. This research not only addresses the urgent need for improved protective measures in the shipping sector but also contributes to reducing economic losses attributed to corrosion, estimated at 3-4% of GDP annually.

References

[1] G. Vukelic, G. Vizentin, J. Brnic, M. Brcic, and F. Sedmak, “Long-Term Marine Environment Exposure Effect on Butt-Welded Shipbuilding Steel,” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 2021, Vol. 9, Page 491, vol. 9, no. 5, p. 491, May 2021, doi: 10.3390/JMSE9050491.

[2] N. Momčilović, N. Ilić, M. Kalajdžić, Š. Ivošević, and A. Petrović, “Effect of Corrosion-Induced Structural Degradation on the Ultimate Strength of a High-Tensile-Steel Ship Hull,” J. Mar. Sci. Eng., vol. 12, no. 5, May 2024, doi: 10.3390/jmse12050745.

[3] N. Momcilovic, N. Ilic, M. Kalajdžic, Š. Ivoševic, and A. Petrovic, “Pitting and uniform corrosion effects on ultimate strength of a bulk carrier,” Procedia Structural Integrity, vol. 48, pp. 1–7, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2023.07.104.

[4] R. P. Dwinanda, L. A. F. Haryoko, and J. C. Kurnia, “The effect of epoxy and non-epoxy coating treatment on the corrosion of low carbon steel in sodium chloride solutions,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 46, pp. 1699–1704, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.371.

[5] M. Iannuzzi and G. S. Frankel, “The carbon footprint of steel corrosion,” Npj Mater. Degrad., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 101, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1038/S41529-022-00318-1.

[6] I. Wijaya, D. Aqila, R. Riastuti, and R. T. Ramadhani, “Analysis the Effect of Different Surface Preparation Methods on Corrosion Resistance and Adhesion Strength of ASTM A36 Steel Substrate with Surface Tolerant Epoxy Paint as Coating Material,” Journal of Engineering and Scientific Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 52–58, 2024, doi: 10.23960/jesr.v6i1.152.

[7] A. Rajput, M. Ak, S. J. Kim, S. H. Noh, J. H. Park, and J. K. Paik, “Effects of the surface preparation on the life of epoxy coating in steel ship plates: an experimental study,” Ships and Offshore Structures, vol. 14, no. sup1, pp. 199–206, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1080/17445302.2019.1565072.

[8] ASTM International, “ASTM A36/A36M – 97: Standard Specification for Carbon Structural Steel,” vol. 552, no. 2, 1997.

[9] J. Rekayasa, D. Energi, I. W. Santoso, D. Aqila, R. Riastuti, and R. T. Ramadhani, “Analysis the Effect of Different Surface Preparation Methods on Corrosion Resistance of ASTM-A36 Steel,” Jurnal Rekayasa Material, Manufaktur dan Energi, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 310–319, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.30596/rmme.v7i2.18884.

[10] “Surface Preparation Standards Explained - SSPC/NACE & ISO 8501.” Accessed: Nov. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.graco.com/gb/en/contractor/solutions/articles/surface-prep-standards-explained-sspc-nace-iso-8501.html

[11] B. V. Gbenontin, M. Kang, N. J. Ndiithi, S. M. Nyambura, E. Awuah, and Y. Zhang, “Effect of Grit Blasting and Polishing Pretreatments on the Microhardness, Adhesion and Corrosion Properties of Electrodeposited Ni-W/SiC Nanocomposite Coatings on 45 Steel Substrate,” Crystals 2021, Vol. 11, vol. 11, no. 7, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.3390/cryst11070729.

[12] M. Droździel-Jurkiewicz and J. Bieniaś, “Evaluation of Surface Treatment for Enhancing Adhesion at the Metal–Composite Interface in Fibre Metal-Laminates,” Materials 2022, Vol. 15, Page 6118, vol. 15, no. 17, p. 6118, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.3390/MA15176118.

[13] “Interbond 201 Epoxy Primer/Finish”, Accessed: Feb. 18, 2026. [Online]. Available: www.international-pc.com,

[14] C. Seng, S. W. Lee, and Y. K. Kim, “Influence of Surface Drainage Capacity and Water Film Thickness on Wet Pavement Friction of Tined and Diamond-Grooved Concrete Pavements,” International Journal of Highway Engineering, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1–10, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.7855/ijhe.2025.27.4.001.

[15] M. A. Quinones-Salinas and R. D. Mercado-Solis, “Comparative study of three methods for measuring thickness of PVD hard coatings,” International Journal of Surface Science and Engineering, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 493–509, 2015, doi: 10.1504/IJSURFSE.2015.072831.

[16] “Test Method for Measurement of Coating Thicknesses by the Magnetic Method: Nonmagnetic Coatings on Magnetic Basis Metals,” Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1520/B0499-09R21E01.

[17] P. Jafari, A. A. S. Alvani, H. Sameie, F. Rosei, and J. Ou, “Transparent and durable superhydrophobic coatings for photovoltaic applications via fluorine-free nanocomposite design,” J. Mater. Sci., vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 6092–6115, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.1007/s10853-026-12158-4.

[18] H. Gerengi, M. Maraşlı, K. Coskun, V. Ozdal, İ. Uygur, and M. Aksu, “Maintenance of corroded silos: A case study,” Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 234–247, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.29130/dubited.1505994.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

Hidayat, R., Dewa, R. T., Utomo, T. Y. R., Rizky, M., Ramadhan, M. M., Kristiyono, L. B. F., & Rofiq, A. (2026). A Comparative Analysis of Epoxy Coating Quality on ASTM AH-36 Steel Plates Using Surface Preparation Methods. Jurnal Rekayasa Mesin, 21(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.32497/jrm.v21i1.7507