Audit Committee Characteristics in Driving ESG Performance under ESG Exposure Conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32497/keunis.v14i2.7568Keywords:
Audit Committee, ESG, ESG Exposure, Resource Dependence Theory, PerformanceAbstract
This empirical study is based on Resource Dependence Theory (RDT) and investigates how the presence of the ESG Exposure variable affects the relationship between audit committee meeting attendance, audit committee independence, audit committee expertise and audit committee size with ESG performance. The results are obtained using Fixed Effect Model (FEM) with cluster-robust standard error on 461 firm-year observations of 91 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (ISX) during 2016-2025, which is contrary to the traditional governance theory. There is little significant impact on ESG performance from the attendance of the meeting or independence, implying behaviours that are ceremonial in nature, and only expertise is a positive driver. The size of the committee has a strong negative impact as predicted by social loafing and coordination failure. The results of moderation analysis suggest that ESG Exposure, in general, does not strengthen the effectiveness of governance, but it significantly exacerbates the adverse impact of Committee Size in high-risk industries where the bloat of the committee negatively affects agile decision making on sustainability. The results indicate a need for a shift in regulation from quantitative structural indicators to norms of competency in cognition and engagement. Policymakers and shareholders of energy and emission-heavy industries should focus on governance based on "lean" and "competent," and not "social loafers" with too many members that perpetuate "social loafing pathologies" that lead to lower ESG performance and green stock prices.
References
AlHares, A. (2025). Evaluating Emission Reduction Policies and the Influence of Corporate Governance. Sustainability, 17(18), 8204. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188204
Almutair, M., & Al Barrak, T. (2024). The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on ESG. Scientific Journal of King Faisal University: Humanities and Management Sciences, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.37575/h/mng/240014
Al‐Shaer, H., & Zaman, M. (2018). Credibility of sustainability reports: The contribution of audit committees. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 973–986. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2046
Alsultan, A., & Hussainey, K. (2025). Does nomination committee diversity influence the relationship between audit committee diversity and ESG disclosure? Evidence from the UK. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-09-2024-0628
Aprianti, S., Susetyo, D., Meutia, I., & Fuadah, L. L. (2022). Audit Committee Characteristics and Sustainability Reporting in Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220304.006
Arif, M., Sajjad, A., Farooq, S., Abrar, M., & Joyo, A. S. (2021). The impact of audit committee attributes on the quality and quantity of environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(3), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0243
Attia, E. F., Diab, A., Ezz Eldeen, H. H., & Abdou, H. A. (2025). Unravelling non-linear dynamics between audit committees and financial reporting quality in emerging markets. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2524045
Belouadah, F. (2026). The Role of Audit Committee Characteristics in Enhancing the Quality of ESG Accounting Disclosures: Panel Data Evidence from Saudi-Listed Firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 19(3), 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19030223
Brighi, P., Della Bina, A. C. F., & Venturelli, V. (2025). Firm value and risk: how relevant are ESG factors and ESG controversies? Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-12-2024-0953
Elmghaamez, I. K., Nwachukwu, J., & Ntim, C. G. (2024). ESG disclosure and financial performance of multinational enterprises: The moderating effect of board standing committees. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 29(3), 3593–3638. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2846
Gull, A. A., Sarang, A. A. A., Mushtaq, R., & Ahsan, T. (2024). Sustainability committee and environmental decoupling: International evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(2), 1268–1287. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2631
Itan, I., Sylvia, S., Septiany, S., & Chen, R. (2025). The influence of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on market reaction: evidence from emerging markets. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01085-0
Junus, O., Nasih, M., Anshori, M., & Harymawan, I. (2022). Politically connected independent board and firm performance. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2069638
Karim, R., Roshid, Md. M., Dhar, B. K., Nahiduzzaman, Md., & Kuri, B. C. (2024). Audit Committee Characteristics and Sustainable Firms’ Performance: Evidence From the Financial Sector in Bangladesh. Business Strategy & Development, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70059
Le, D. Q., Ngoc, Q. N., Do, T. M. N., Hong, N. L., & Ngoc, M. A. V. (2025). How does the audit committee affect ESG performance? A case of China. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 15(7), 1058–1079. https://doi.org/10.55493/5002.v15i7.5471
Liu, J., & Xie, J. (2024). The Effect of ESG Performance on Bank Liquidity Risk. Sustainability, 16(12), 4927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124927
Maroun, W. (2022). Corporate governance and the use of external assurance for integrated reports. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 30(5), 584–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12430
Mutsa Ruziwa, R., Damascene Mvunabandi, J., & Cyril Nomlala, B. (2025). Audit committee characteristics and environmental, social, and governance reporting quality: An analysis of top 100 JSE-listed corporations. Accounting and Financial Control, 6(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.21511/afc.06(1).2025.04
Nandi, A., Agarwala, N., & Sahu, T. N. (2025). Can Corporate Governance and Sustainability Policies Drive CSR Performance? An Empirical Study. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 32(1), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-024-09446-x
Pozzoli, M., Pagani, A., & Paolone, F. (2022). The impact of audit committee characteristics on ESG performance in the European Union member states: Empirical evidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Cleaner Production, 371, 133411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133411
Sahu, M., Mishra, A., Alahdal, W. M., & Sami, M. (2025). ESG performance and audit committee expertise: advancing sustainable development goals in leading nations. International Review of Economics & Finance, 103, 104445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104445
Sobhan, R., Mim, F. F., & Rahman, F. (2025). Nexus between audit committee characteristics and audit report lag in an emerging economy: an analysis using frequentist and Bayesian regression models. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 9(2), 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEB-04-2024-0043
Umar, U. H., Firmansyah, E. A., Danlami, M. R., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2024). Revisiting the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and ESG disclosures in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 20(4), 724–747. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-01-2023-0011
Yang, Y., Du, Z., Zhang, Z., Tong, G., & Zhou, R. (2021). Does ESG Disclosure Affect Corporate-Bond Credit Spreads? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 13(15), 8500. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158500
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
KEUNIS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
