Determinants of ESG Disclosure in ASEAN-5 Countries: A Legitimacy and Institutional Theory Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32497/keunis.v13i2.6392Keywords:
ESG Disclosure, Carbon Emission, Product Diversification, Business Environmental Uncertainty, Geographic LocationAbstract
ESG disclosure among basic materials firms in the ASEAN-5 countries remains uneven, with notable implementation gaps. Drawing on legitimacy and institutional theories, this study employs moderated regression analysis on 185 firms from a population of 2.110 during 2019–2023 to identify key determinants of ESG reporting. Results reveal that carbon emission intensity and product disclosure. Results show that higher carbon emission intensity leads to greater ESG disclosure, suggesting firms seek legitimacy by providing extensive ESG information despite higher emissions. Firms with more diversified products also exhibit higher ESG disclosure, as complexity requires transparency to manage environmental and social risks. Contrary to expectations, business environmental uncertainty does not significantly influence ESG disclosure, supporting contingency theory’s view that no single strategy fits all firms in navigating uncertainty. Geographic location negatively affects ESG disclosure, highlighting resource constraints and underdeveloped ESG infrastructure, particularly in Indonesia. Gender diversity significantly moderates the effects of environmental uncertainty and geographic location, strengthening their impact on ESG disclosure. However, its interaction with carbon emission intensity and product diversification is not significant. These findings deepen understanding of the institutional and legitimacy factors influencing ESG disclosure in emerging markets.
References
Adu, D. A., Flynn, A., & Grey, C. (2023). Carbon performance, financial performance and market value: The moderating effect of pay incentives. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 2111–2135. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3239
Alandejani, M., & Al-Shaer, H. (2023). Macro Uncertainty Impacts on ESG Performance and Carbon Emission Reduction Targets. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054249
Banerjee, R., Gupta, K., & McIver, R. (2019). What matters most to firm-level environmentally sustainable practices: Firm–specific or country–level factors? Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.008
Baratta, A., Cimino, A., Longo, F., Solina, V., & Verteramo, S. (2023). The Impact of ESG Practices in Industry with a Focus on Carbon Emissions: Insights and Future Perspectives. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086685
Barros, V., Verga Matos, P., Miranda Sarmento, J., & Rino Vieira, P. (2024). ESG performance and firms’ business and geographical diversification: An empirical approach. Journal of Business Research, 172(February 2023), 114392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114392
Barroso, R., Duan, T., Guo, S. (Sarina), & Kowalewski, O. (2024). Board gender diversity reform and corporate carbon emissions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 87, 102616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102616
Bhandari, K. R., Ranta, M., & Salo, J. (2022). The resource-based view, stakeholder capitalism, ESG, and sustainable competitive advantage: The firm’s embeddedness into ecology, society, and governance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1525–1537. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2967
Bin-Feng, C., Mirza, S. S., Ahsan, T., & Qureshi, M. A. (2024). How uncertainty can determine corporate ESG performance? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(3), 2290–2310. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2695
Boivie, S., Bednar, M. K., Aguilera, R. V., & Andrus, J. L. (2016). Are Boards Designed to Fail? The Implausibility of Effective Board Monitoring. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 319–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2016.1120957
Braasch, A., & Velte, P. (2023). Climate reporting quality following the recommendations of the task force on climate-related financial disclosures: A Focus on the German capital market. Sustainable Development, 31(2), 926–940. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2430
Briano-Turrent, G. del C. (2022). Female representation on boards and corporate ethical behavior in Latin American companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 30(1), 1–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12416
Brower, J., & Dacin, P. A. (2020). An Institutional Theory Approach to the Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance – Corporate Financial Performance Relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 57(4), 805–836. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12550
Chebbi, K., & Ammer, M. A. (2022). Board Composition and ESG Disclosure in Saudi Arabia: The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance Reforms. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912173
Chukwuemeka, N. K., Ulusow, A. H., & Sylvanus, O. M. (2024). Climate change, causes, economic impact and mitigation. International Journal of Scientific Research Updates, 8(1), 001–008. https://doi.org/10.53430/ijsru.2024.8.1.0043
Crossley, R. M., Elmagrhi, M. H., & Ntim, C. G. (2021). Sustainability and legitimacy theory: The case of sustainable social and environmental practices of small and medium-sized enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3740–3762. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2837
David, L. K., Wang, J., & Jr, V. D. (2024). Economic and Governance Dimensions of ESG Performance : A Comparative Study in the Developing and European Countries. The Journal of Developing Areas, 58(4), 221–240.
Delina, L. L. (2021). Topographies of coal mining dissent: Power, politics, and protests in southern Philippines. World Development, 137, 105194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105194
Duan, W., Xue, X., Chen, Z., & Liu, L. (2025). How do institutional pressures influence corporate social responsibility? —A perspective based on state-owned enterprises. Information Technology and Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-025-00447-4
Dutordoir, M., Schoubben, F., Struyfs, K., & Torsin, W. (2024). Environmental pressure and board gender diversity: Evidence from the European Union Emission Trading System. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(5), 3911–3935. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3686
Dwijayanti, W., & Jayanti, D. (2024). Do Independent Commissioners, Green Investments, and Green Innovation Affect Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)? Keunis, 12(2), 133–143. https://jurnal.polines.ac.id/index.php/keunis
Emma, G. M., Emiliano, R. B., & Jennifer, M. F. (2024). High-quality assurance, ESG legitimacy threats and board effectiveness. British Accounting Review, 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101385
Fadila, S., Iddhiyan, A. N., Arifudin, N., Walidah, Z., Rizki, D. W., & Amelia. (2024). Analisis Kelalaian Perusahaan PT Indonesia Morowali Industrial Park (PT . IMIP) terhadap Keselamatan Pekerja PT Indonesia Thingshan Stainless Stell ( ITSS ). Jurnal Integrasi Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik, 1(2), 194–103. https://journal.lpkd.or.id/index.php/Sosial/article/view/226/267
Fatmawati, V. A., & Hariyana, N. (2024). The Effect of Product Diversification and Company Size on Company Profitability Case Study on UD Setya Abadi D.M. Integration: Journal Of Social Sciences And Culture, 2(1), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.38142/ijssc.v2i1.136
Ferrón Vilchez, V., Darnall, N., & Aragón Correa, J. A. (2017). Stakeholder influences on the design of firms’ environmental practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3370–3381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.129
Gavana, G., Gottardo, P., & Moisello, A. M. (2024). The impact of board gender diversity on ESG disclosure. A contingency perspective. Meditari Accountancy Research, 33(7), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-07-2024-2567
Guo, X., Cheng, P., & Choi, B. (2024). Impact of corporate environmental uncertainty on environmental, social, and governance performance: The role of government, investors, and geopolitical risk. PLoS ONE, 19(8), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309559
Gupta, A. K., & Gupta, N. (2021). Environment Practices Mediating the Environmental Compliance and firm Performance: An Institutional Theory Perspective from Emerging Economies. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 22(3), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-021-00266-w
Hmouda, A. M. O., Orzes, G., Sauer, P. C., & Molinaro, M. (2024). Determinants of environmental, social and governance scores: Evidence from the electric power supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 471(August). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143372
Ikhlasi, H. H. (2025). Dampak Kecelakaan Kerja terhadap Citra Perusahaan : Studi Kasus PT Dampak Kecelakaan Kerja terhadap Citra Perusahaan : Studi Kasus PT Indonesia Morowali Industrial Park ( IMIP ). January, 0–8. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32965.15843
Irianingsih, E., Ahmad, G. N., & Buchdadi, A. D. (2024). The Influence of Environmental, Social and Governance and the Risk of Financial Information Disclosure on Investment Efficiency in Environmentally Sensitive …. International Journal of Economics, Management, and Accounting, 2024(12), 943–952. https://ij.lafadzpublishing.com/index.php/IJEMA/article/view/134
Jayanto, I., Anggraeni, I. P., & Safitransyah, R. P. (2025). Resilience of SMEs in Facing Economic Crises: Business Model Adaptation, Product Diversification, and Resource Optimization. 3(1), 616–623.
Jiang, L., Zhou, W., Hualiang, W., & Deng, W. (2025). Impact of business environment uncertainty on ESG performance from the perspective of resource supply and demand based on ESG performance. 85(September 2024), 1012–1030.
Jiang, P. C. (2024). National ESG index update: An assessment of the G20 countries. Innovation and Green Development, 3(2), 100147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2024.100147
Jongsma, R., & Pennink, B. (Bartjan). (2020). The Effect of Product Diversification on Corporate Social Performance in the Non-Renewable Energy Industry: Exploring the moderating effects of host country development and the Sustainable Development Goals. The Central European Review of Economics and Management, 4(4), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.29015/cerem.893
King’ori, P. G., Wachira, A. W., & Mwenda, L. K. (2024). Effect of Diversification Strategies on the Market Performance of Small and Medium-Tier Deposit-Taking SACCOs in Kenya. African Journal of Emerging Issues, 6(16), 97–114.
Konadu, R., Ahinful, G. S., Boakye, D. J., & Elbardan, H. (2022). Board gender diversity, environmental innovation and corporate carbon emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174(March 2021), 121279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121279
Kretschmer, T., & Symeou, P. C. (2024). Absorptive capacity components: Performance effects in related and unrelated diversification. Long Range Planning, 57(2), 102416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2024.102416
Kusuma, S. Y., Sudarman, S., & Arumsari, V. (2021). Can Board of Directors Diversity and Monitoring Intensity Improve Bank Profitability? Performance, 28(01), 26. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jp.2021.28.01.3697
Kusuma, S. Y., Sudarman, S., & Astutik, D. (2018). Pengaruh Diversitas Gender Dewan Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pada Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bei Periode 2014-2017. Equilibrium: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 6(2), 253. https://doi.org/10.21043/equilibrium.v6i2.4782
Laksono, G., & Putri, A. P. R. Z. (2024). The Impact Of Coal and Nickel Shocks On Stock Volatility Throughout The Dynamic Era. Keunis, 12(2), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.32497/keunis.v12i2.
Lin, S. C., & Kim, Y. R. (2020). Diversification strategies and failure rates in the Texas lodging industry: Franchised versus company-operated hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 88(April), 102525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102525
Liu, M. (2022). Quantitative ESG disclosure and divergence of ESG ratings. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.936798
Lu, J., & Herremans, I. M. (2019). Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1449–1464. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2326
Malini, H. (2024). Firm Size, Profitability, and ESG Disclosure in Indonesia: Geographical Location As Moderating Variable. International Journal of Economics Development Research, 5(2), 2024–2878.
Martinez Meyers, S., Ferrero-Ferrero, I., & Muñoz-Torres, M. J. (2024). ARE sustainable funds doing the talk and the walk? An ESG score analysis of fund portfolio holdings. International Review of Economics and Finance, 93(October 2023), 1526–1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.04.023
Menicucci, E., & Paolucci, G. (2024). Board gender equality and ESG performance. Evidence from European banking sector. 24(8), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-04-2023-0146
Merma-Molina, G., Urrea-Solano, M., & Hernández-Amorós, M. J. (2024). The Integration of Gender Equality (SDG 5) into University Teaching: the View from the Frontline. In Innovative Higher Education (Vol. 49, Issue 3). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09668-3
Odriozola, M. D., González, A. B., & Baraibar-Diez, E. (2024). The link of ESG performance and board gender diversity in European firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, May 2023, 5656–5669. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2881
Patrisia, D., & Dastgir, S. (2017). Diversification and corporate social performance in manufacturing companies. Eurasian Business Review, 7(1), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-016-0052-6
Posadas, S. C., Ruiz-Blanco, S., Fernandez-Feijoo, B., & Tarquinio, L. (2022). Institutional isomorphism under the test of Non-financial Reporting Directive. Evidence from Italy and Spain. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(7), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2022-1606
Risi, D., Vigneau, L., Bohn, S., & Wickert, C. (2023). Institutional theory‐based research on corporate social responsibility: Bringing values back in. International Journal of Management Reviews, 25(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12299
Romano, M., Cirillo, A., Favino, C., & Netti, A. (2020). ESG (Environmental, social and governance) performance and board gender diversity: The moderating role of CEO duality. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(21), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219298
Rosser, C., Ilgenstein, S. A., & Sager, F. (2022). The Iterative Process of Legitimacy-Building in Hybrid Organizations. Administration and Society, 54(6), 1117–1147. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211055102
Shi, J., Yang, F., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Huang, W., & Wang, J. (2023). A case study on application and commissioning of coal pyrolysis wastewater treatment project. Journal of Cleaner Production, 392(October 2022), 136324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136324
Skandera, D. J., McKenny, A. F., & Combs, J. G. (2023). The Influence of Task Environmental Uncertainty on the Balance Between Normative and Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility. In Journal of Management (Vol. 49, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211070270
Sun, Y., & Zhao, Z. (2024). Responsible investment: Institutional shareholders and ESG performance. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 85(December 2023), 102357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102357
Thammaraksa, C., Gebara, C. H., Hauschild, M. Z., Pontoppidan, C. A., & Laurent, A. (2024). Business reporting of Sustainable Development Goals: Global trends and implications. Business Strategy and the Environment, January, 5445–5462. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3760
Treepongkaruna, S., Au Yong, H. H., Thomsen, S., & Kyaw, K. (2024). Greenwashing, carbon emission, and ESG. Business Strategy and the Environment, July, 8526–8539. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3929
Vural-Yavaş, Ç. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty, stakeholder engagement, and environmental, social, and governance practices: The moderating effect of competition. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 82–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2034
Wang, W., Sun, Z., Wang, W., Hua, Q., & Wu, F. (2023). The impact of environmental uncertainty on ESG performance: Emotional vs. rational. Journal of Cleaner Production, 397(February), 136528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136528
Wedari, L. K., Jubb, C., & Moradi-Motlagh, A. (2021). Corporate climate-related voluntary disclosures: Does potential greenwash exist among Australian high emitters reports? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3721–3739. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2836
Wongsaen, C., Dheera-Aumpon, S., & Punyasavatsut, A. (2023). Economic Recession from Household Responses to an Epidemic and Consumption Stimulus Measures in Thailand. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 19(2), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2023.19-2.1
Wu, D., & Memon, H. (2022). Public Pressure, Environmental Policy Uncertainty, and Enterprises’ Environmental Information Disclosure. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(12), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14126948
Yang, W., & Hei, Y. (2024). Research on the Impact of Enterprise ESG Ratings on Carbon Emissions from a Spatial Perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093826
Yu, J., & Hwang, Y. S. (2024). The Interaction Effects of Board Independence and Digital Transformation on Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance: Complementary or Substitutive? Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16209098
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
KEUNIS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
