Optimisation of Energy Consumption Balance in Multi-Hop Topology Wireless Sensor Networks for Environmental Monitoring Systems along Railway Tracks

Authors

  • Amin Suharjono Teknik Elektro, Politeknik Negeri Semarang
  • Eskandaru Erin Sadewa

Keywords:

IoT, WSN, Straight-line topology

Abstract

The implementation of IoT requires careful planning so that the system can function optimally. This study describes the planning of WSN development as a network in an IoT system with a long, straight topology, such as that found on railway tracks. The planning includes the use of appropriate technology with minimal power consumption. Three simulation scenarios were conducted using LPSAN, LPWAN, and a combination of both to compare their performance on a straight-line topology. The profile of each technology in LPSAN and LPWAN in terms of their performance in transmitting sensor data in the IoT system will be determined. The network lifetime performance is also determined to demonstrate the energy efficiency of each technology. Thus, the most optimal scenario in terms of configuration and topology in a straight-line network will be selected. From the experiments conducted, it is concluded that multihop topology is generally recommended for use in straight-line networks compared to star topology, except in conditions where nodes are very close to the gateway

Author Biography

Amin Suharjono, Teknik Elektro, Politeknik Negeri Semarang

Electrical Dept. of Politeknik Negeri Semarang

References

B. Dziadak, M. Kucharek, and J. Starzyński, “Powering the WSN Node for Monitoring Rail Car Parameters, Using a Piezoelectric Energy Harvester,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 5, Art. no. 5, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15051641.

[2] A. H. Saputra, P. H. Trisnawan, and F. A. Bakhtiar, “Performance Analysis of the 6LoWPAN Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks with Grid Network Topology and Random Network Topology Using the Cooja Simulator,” J. Pengemb. Information Technology and Computer Science, vol. 3, no. 4, Art. no. 4, January 2019.

[3] O. Kazeem, O. Akintade, and L. Kehinde, “Comparative Study of Communication Interfaces for Sensors and Actuators in the Cloud of Internet of Things,” Int. J. Internet Things, vol. 6, pp. 9–13, June 2017, doi: 10.5923/j.ijit.20170601.02.

[4] A. A. Laksono, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A PROTOTYPE FOR MONITORING TRAIN POSITIONS BASED ON WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS. Telkom University, Bachelor of Electrical Engineering, 2016. Accessed: 27 November 2024. [Online]. Available: https://repositori.telkomuniversity.ac.id/pustaka/121764/rancang-bangun-prototipe-pemantauan-posisi-kereta-berbasis-wireless-sensor-network.html

[5] I. Farikha, “Prototype Landslide Disaster Detector Using Accelerometer and Gyroscope Sensors with the Internet of Things (IoT) Concept,” January 2020, Accessed: 27 November 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/99759010/Prototype_Detektor_Bencana_Tanah_Longsor_Menggunakan_Accelerometer_And_Gyroscope_Sensor_Dengan_Konsep_Internet_Of_Things_iot_

[6] G. Quoc-Anh, N. Dinh-Chinh, T. Duc-Nghia, T. Duc-Tan, K. N. Thi, and K. Sandrasegaran, “Wireless Technology for Monitoring Site-specific Landslides in Vietnam,” Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. IJECE, vol. 8, no. 6, Art. no. 6, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v8i6.pp4448-4455.

[7] M. V. Ramesh, "Design, development, and deployment of a wireless sensor network for detection of landslides," Ad Hoc Netw., vol. 13, pp. 2–18, February 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.09.002.

[8] A. I. Ali and S. Zorlu Partal, “Development and performance analysis of a ZigBee and LoRa-based smart building sensor network,” Frontiers in Energy Research, vol. 10, August 2022, doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2022.933743.

[9] F. Albalas, W. Mardini, M. Al-Soud, and Q. Yaseen, “A topology–based performance evaluation for an adaptive tuning protocol for service and resource discovery in the Internet of Things,” in 2019 IEEE 9th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), January 2019, pp. 0905–0909. doi: 10.1109/CCWC.2019.8666465.

[10] É. Morin, M. Maman, R. Guizzetti, and A. Duda, “Comparison of the Device Lifetime in Wireless Networks for the Internet of Things,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 7097–7114, 2017, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2688279.

[11] W. R. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan, “Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 2000, pp. 10–20, vol. 2. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2000.926982.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30

Issue

Section

Articles