Objective Video Quality Assessment of Direct Recording and Datavideo HDR-40 Recording System

Authors

  • Nofia Andreana Politeknik Negeri Semarang
  • Arif Nursyahid Politeknik Negeri Semarang
  • Eni Dwi Wardihani Politeknik Negeri Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32497/jaict.v1i1.422

Keywords:

MSE, PSNR, Video Quality, Objective Video Quality, Objective Video Quality Assessment.

Abstract

Digital Video Recorder (DVR) is a digital video recorder with hard drive storage media. When the capacity of the hard disk runs out. It will provide information to users and if there is no response, it will be overwritten automatically and the data will be lost.
The main focus of this paper is to enable recording directly connected to a computer editor. The output of both systems (DVR and Direct Recording) will be compared with an objective assessment using the Mean Square Error (MSE) and Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) parameter. The results showed that the average value of MSE Direct Recording dB 797.8556108, 137.4346100 DVR MSE dB and the average value of PSNR Direct Recording and DVR PSNR dB 19.5942333 27.0914258 dB. This indicates that the DVR has a much better output quality than Direct Recording.  

References

Schaeffler, Jimmy. 2013. “Digital Video Recorders: DVRs Changing TV and Advertising Forever”. Focal Press. England.

Vitale, Tim. Paul, Messier. 2013. Video Migration in the Preservation Laboratory Tools to Identify and Use Historic Video Equipment. http://videopreservation.conservation-us.org/.

M.Martinez-Rach, O.López, P.Piñol, M.P.Malumbres. 2007. “PSNR vs. quality assessment metrics for image and video codecperformance evaluation”. Dept. de Física y Arquitectura de Computadores Universidad Miguel Hernández.

Franco, Almada Valdez. 2012. “Objective Video Quality Assessment Considering Frame and Display Time V ariation”.

Bovik, A. C., “Automatic prediction of perceptual image and video quality” Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 101, no. 9, pp. 2008”“2024, Sept. 2013.

Akramullah, Shahriar. 2014. Digital Video Concepts, Methods, and Metrics: Quality, Compression, Performance, and Power Trade-off Analysis. Apress. New York.

Tekalp, A.Murat. 2015. Digital Video Processing Second Edition. Prentice Hall. Massachusetts.

Widhiarso, Wahyu. 2012. Uji Hipotesis Komparatif.

Downloads

Published

2016-10-19

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2016)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).