COMPARISON ANALYSIS PERFORMANCE OF SYNOLOGY NAS AND XIGMANAS WITH RAID CONFIGURATION

Fatria Ikram Majid

Abstract


This research is to find out which NAS performance is the best in handling file delivery with RAID configuration, the methods needed in this test include transfer rate parameters, CPU and Memory resource usage, and QoS which includes throughput, delay, and packet loss by uploading and testing. download with variations in different file capacities. The results showed that synology is better in the transfer rate parameters of both RAID configurations, both upload and download, with the delivery of variations in file capacity delivery with an average transfer rate of 116-118MBps, and xigmanas 97-118MBps. In the resource usage parameter, the percentage of resource usage in both RAID configurations with testing upload or download xigmanas is lower with CPU usage 22%, memory usage 1.4-1.5GB or 30%, compared to synology CPU 30-34%, with CPU usage memory 190-201MB or about 42%. On the parameters of QoS throughput xigmanas 780-930Mbit/s, and Synology >800Mbit/s (standard >75% very good) from both upload and download RAID configurations. The average delay of both servers is 0.03ms (standard <150ms is very good), and packetloss is 0 (standard 0% is very good) on both servers from upload and download tests. QoS results from both servers are in very good category according to TIPHON standards

Keywords


Telecommunication; Information technology;Computer

Full Text:

PDF

References


T. Andriani, M. Hidayatullah, D. Saputra, S. Esabella, and G. Gunawan, “Building data centers using Network Attached Storage (NAS) and Microprocessor Operating Systems,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1088, no. 1, p. 012076, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/1088/1/012076.

R. Astuti, I. Ruslianto, J. Rekayasa Sistem Komputer, and F. H. MIPA Universitas Tanjungpura Jalan Hadari Nawawi Pontianak, “RANCANG BANGUN NETWORK ATTACHED STORAGE PADA RASPBERRY PI 3 MODEL B BERBASIS WEBSITE,” 2020.

Muhammad and J. Asshiddiq, “Network Attached Storage (NAS) Menggunakan Desktop PC,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Ilmu Komput. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 3, no. 2, 2018.

A. Kurniawan, A. Hendri Hendrawan, and B. A. Prakosa, “74 Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi Universitas Ibn Khaldun,” 2018.

A. Suganda, W. Cholil, and R. D. Nasrul Halim, “ANALISA PERBANDINGAN KINERJA SISTEM OPERASI NETWORK ATTACHED STORAGE (NAS) MENGGUNAKAN FREENAS DAN NAS4FREE.”

T. Indra Suhadi, “PEMBUATAN NETWORK ATTACHED STORAGE MENGGUNAKAN FREENAS DAN KONFIGURASI REDUNDANT ARRAY OF INDEPENDENT DISK,” 2017.

A. Quality et al., “Skripsi Diajukan Untuk Memenuhi Persyaratan Memperoleh Gelar Sarjana Sistem Informasi ABDUL AZIZ MUHARRAM 2021 M VIRTUAL LOCAL AREA NETWORK PADA UIN SYARIF 2021 M,” 2021.

D. M. Graham, M. J. Graham, and M. Mupparapu, “Use of redundant arrays of inexpensive disks in orthodontic practice,” Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop., vol. 151, no. 4, pp. 816–820, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.10.022.

T. Dutta and A. R. Barnard, “Performance of hard disk drives in high noise environments,” Noise Control Eng. J., vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 386–395, 2017, doi: 10.3397/1/376555.

I. Journal, “Analysis Study on SSD, HDD, and SSHD,” Interantional J. Sci. Res. Eng. Manag., vol. 06, no. 06, pp. 3635–3641, 2022, doi: 10.55041/ijsrem14524.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32497/jaict.v7i2.3774

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 2541-6340
Online ISSN: 2541-6359

Visitor: 

View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.