ANALISIS PEMAHAMAN PERILAKU MAHASISWA MENGGUNAKAN ELEARNING: PERSPEKTIF MODEL TAM PADA POLITEKNIK

Muhammad Noor Ardiansah

Abstract


The study examined a technology acceptance model (TAM) perspective on electronic learning using
Polytechnic students. The study was conducted on Politeknik Negeri Semarang students who had and
were using Elnino as official electronic learning, using structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis.
Empirically the results presented a technology acceptance model in online learning, with the determinant
of behavioral intentions is the perception of belief in the usefulness of Elnino. At the same time, the
attitude towards the use of Elnino is determined by the perception of belief in the usefulness, ease of use,
and social, environmental norms of Polines students. Self-confidence and accessibility on the Elnino have
an indirect effect on the use attitude, through the perception of belief in the usefulness and ease of use of
Elnino.
Keywords: E-Learning, technology acceptance, attitude of e-learning, behaviroal intention


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes And Predicting Social

Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior And

Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

Bandura, A. (1994). Self-Efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia Of

Human Behavior (Pp. 71–81). New York, NY:

Academic Press. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. G. (1980). Significance Tests And

Goodness-Of-Fit In The Analysis Of Covariance Structure. Psychological

Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606

Bollen, K. A. (1990). Overall Fit In Covariance Structure Models: Two Types Of

Sample Size Effects. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 256–259.

Concannon, F., Flynn A., & Campbell. (2005). What Campus-Based Students Think

About The Quality And Benefits Of E-learning. British Journal Of Educational

Technology. 36(2), 501–512.

David, A. K. (1998). Multiple Factor Models. Retrieved May 14, 2007 From

Http://Davidakenny.Net/Cm/Mfactor.Htm Davis, F. D. (1986). A Technology

Acceptance Model For Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems:

Theory And Results. Doctoral Dissertation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School

Of Management.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, And User

Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly,13(3), 319–339.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance Of Computer

Technology: A Comparison Of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science,

(8), 982–1003.

Economist Intelligence Unit. (2003). The 2003 E-Readiness Rankings. New York, NY:

EIU.

Elloumi, F. (2004). Value Chain Analysis: A Strategic Approach To Online Learning.

In A. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and Practice Of Online Learning (Pp.

–92). Athabasca, Canada: Athabasca University.

Grandon, E., Alshare, O., & Kwan, O. (2005). Factors Influencing Student Intention To

Adopt Online Classes: A Cross-Cultural Study. Journal Of Computing Sciences In

Colleges, 20(4), 46–56.

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data

Analysis: (5th Ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hill. Hara, N. (2000).

Student Distress In A Web-Based Distance Education Course. Information,

Communication and Society, 3(4), 557–579.

Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The Analysis Of Covariance Structures: Goodness-Of-Fit Indices.

Sociological Methods And Research, 11, 325–344.

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A Guide To The Programs And

Applications. Chicago, IL: SPSS. Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL For

Structural Equation Modeling: A Researcher’s Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kilmurray, J. (2003). E-learning: It’s More Than Automation. The Technology Source

Archives. Retrieved April 20, 2007, From

Http://Technologysource.Org/Article/Elearning/

Kim, C., & Santiago, R. (2005). Constructions Of E-learning Environments In Korea.

Educational Technology Research And Development 53(4), 108–114.

Koohang, A., & Durante, A. (2003). Learners’ Perceptions Toward The Web-Based

Distance Learning Activities/Assignments Portion of An Undergraduate Hybrid

Instructional Model. Journal Of Informational Technology Education, 2, 105–113.

Lee, H. (2006). Creating A Knowledge-Based Society Through E-learning In

Korea. E Educational Technology Research And Development 54(5), 529–540.

Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance Of Internet-Based

Learning Medium: The Role Of Extrinsic And Intrinsic Motivation. Information

& Management, 42, 1095–1104.

Leem, J., & Lim, B. (2007). The Current Status Of E-learning And Strategies To

Enhance Educational Competitiveness In Korean Higher Education. The

International Review Of Research In Open And Distance Learning, 8(1).

Retrieved April 30, 2007 From

http://Www.Irrodl.Org/Index.Php/Irrodl/Article/Viewarticle/380/763

Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why Do People Use Information

Technology? A Critical Review Of The Technology Acceptance Model.

Information & Management, 40, 191–204.

Lin, J. C., & Lu, H. (2000). Towards An Understanding Of The Behavioral Intention To

Use A Web Site. International Journal of Information Management, 20, 197–208.

Liu, S., Liao, H., & Peng, C. (2005). Applying The Technology Acceptance Model And

Flow Theory To Online E-learning Users’ Acceptance Behavior. Issues In

Information Systems, 6(2), 175–181.

Malhotra, Y., & Galletta, D. F. (1999). Extending The Technology Acceptance Model

To Account For Social Influence: Theoretical bases and Empirical Validation.

Proceedings Of The 32nd Hawaii International Conference On System Sciences,

Marsh, H. W, Balla, J. R., & Macdonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-Of-Fit Indexes In

Confirmatory Factor Analysis: The Effect Of Sample Size. Psychological

Bulletin, 88, 245–258.

Mungania, P., & Reio, Jr. T. G. (2005). If E-Learners Get There, Will They Stay? The

Role Of E-learning Self-Efficacy. Eric Ed492287. Paper Presented At The

Academy Of Human Resource Development International Conference (AHRD),

Estes Park, CO, Feb 24–27, 2005, P. 1110–1117 (Symp. 48–2).

Ndubisi, N. O. (2006). Factors Of Online Learning Adoption: A Comparative

Juxtaposition Of The Theory of Planned Behavior And The Technology

Acceptance Model. International Journal On E-learning, 5(4), 571–591.

Newcomb, M. D. (1992). What Structural Equation Modeling Can Tell Us About Social

Support. In I. G. Sarason, B. R. Sarason, & G.

R. Pierce (Eds.), Social Support: An Interactional View. (Pp. 26–63). New York: John

Wiley & Sons

Park, S. Y. (2009). An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in

Understanding University Students' Behavioral Intention to Use e-learning.

Journal of Educational Technology & Society , Vol. 12, No. 3, Technology

Support for Self-Organized Learners (July 2009), pp. 150-162

Pituch, K.A, & Lee, Y.-K. (2006). The Influence Of System Characteristics On Elearning

Use. Computers Education, 47, 222–244.

Saadé, R. G. (2003). Web-Based Education Information System For Enhanced

Learning, EISL: Student Assessment. Journal of Information Technology

Education, 2, 267–277.

Saadé, R. G., Nebebe, F., & Tan, W. (2007). Viability Of The Technology Acceptance

Model In Multimedia Learning Environments: Comparative Study.

Interdisciplinary Journal Of Knowledge And Learning Objects, 37, 175–184.

Selim, H. M. (2003). An Empirical Investigation of Student Acceptance Of Course Web

Sites. Computers & Education, 40, 343–360.

Sobel, M. E. (1987). Direct And Indirect Effects In Linear Structural Equation Models.

Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 155–176.

Surry, D. W., Ensminger, D. C., And Haab, M. (2005). A Model For Integrating

Instructional Technology Into Higher Education. British Journal Of Educational

Technology, 36(2), 327–329.

Thong, J. Y. L., Hong, W., Tam, K. (2002). Understanding User Acceptance Of Digital

Libraries: What Are The Roles Of Interface Characteristics, Organizational

Context, And Individual Differences? International Journal Of Human-Computer

Studies, 57, 215–242

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A Model Of The Antecedents Of Perceived Ease

Of Use: Development And Test. Decision Sciences, 27, 451–481.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension Of The Technology

Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Filed Studies. Management Science, 46,

–204.

Yi, M., & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predicting The Use Of Web-Based Information Systems:

Self-Efficacy, Enjoyment, Learning Goal Orientation, And The Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal Of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 431–


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.