ANALISIS PEMAHAMAN PERILAKU MAHASISWA MENGGUNAKAN ELEARNING: PERSPEKTIF MODEL TAM PADA POLITEKNIK
Abstract
The study examined a technology acceptance model (TAM) perspective on electronic learning using
Polytechnic students. The study was conducted on Politeknik Negeri Semarang students who had and
were using Elnino as official electronic learning, using structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis.
Empirically the results presented a technology acceptance model in online learning, with the determinant
of behavioral intentions is the perception of belief in the usefulness of Elnino. At the same time, the
attitude towards the use of Elnino is determined by the perception of belief in the usefulness, ease of use,
and social, environmental norms of Polines students. Self-confidence and accessibility on the Elnino have
an indirect effect on the use attitude, through the perception of belief in the usefulness and ease of use of
Elnino.
Keywords: E-Learning, technology acceptance, attitude of e-learning, behaviroal intention
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes And Predicting Social
Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior And
Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-Efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia Of
Human Behavior (Pp. 71–81). New York, NY:
Academic Press. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. G. (1980). Significance Tests And
Goodness-Of-Fit In The Analysis Of Covariance Structure. Psychological
Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606
Bollen, K. A. (1990). Overall Fit In Covariance Structure Models: Two Types Of
Sample Size Effects. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 256–259.
Concannon, F., Flynn A., & Campbell. (2005). What Campus-Based Students Think
About The Quality And Benefits Of E-learning. British Journal Of Educational
Technology. 36(2), 501–512.
David, A. K. (1998). Multiple Factor Models. Retrieved May 14, 2007 From
Http://Davidakenny.Net/Cm/Mfactor.Htm Davis, F. D. (1986). A Technology
Acceptance Model For Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems:
Theory And Results. Doctoral Dissertation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School
Of Management.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, And User
Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly,13(3), 319–339.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance Of Computer
Technology: A Comparison Of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science,
(8), 982–1003.
Economist Intelligence Unit. (2003). The 2003 E-Readiness Rankings. New York, NY:
EIU.
Elloumi, F. (2004). Value Chain Analysis: A Strategic Approach To Online Learning.
In A. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.), Theory and Practice Of Online Learning (Pp.
–92). Athabasca, Canada: Athabasca University.
Grandon, E., Alshare, O., & Kwan, O. (2005). Factors Influencing Student Intention To
Adopt Online Classes: A Cross-Cultural Study. Journal Of Computing Sciences In
Colleges, 20(4), 46–56.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data
Analysis: (5th Ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hill. Hara, N. (2000).
Student Distress In A Web-Based Distance Education Course. Information,
Communication and Society, 3(4), 557–579.
Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The Analysis Of Covariance Structures: Goodness-Of-Fit Indices.
Sociological Methods And Research, 11, 325–344.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A Guide To The Programs And
Applications. Chicago, IL: SPSS. Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL For
Structural Equation Modeling: A Researcher’s Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kilmurray, J. (2003). E-learning: It’s More Than Automation. The Technology Source
Archives. Retrieved April 20, 2007, From
Http://Technologysource.Org/Article/Elearning/
Kim, C., & Santiago, R. (2005). Constructions Of E-learning Environments In Korea.
Educational Technology Research And Development 53(4), 108–114.
Koohang, A., & Durante, A. (2003). Learners’ Perceptions Toward The Web-Based
Distance Learning Activities/Assignments Portion of An Undergraduate Hybrid
Instructional Model. Journal Of Informational Technology Education, 2, 105–113.
Lee, H. (2006). Creating A Knowledge-Based Society Through E-learning In
Korea. E Educational Technology Research And Development 54(5), 529–540.
Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance Of Internet-Based
Learning Medium: The Role Of Extrinsic And Intrinsic Motivation. Information
& Management, 42, 1095–1104.
Leem, J., & Lim, B. (2007). The Current Status Of E-learning And Strategies To
Enhance Educational Competitiveness In Korean Higher Education. The
International Review Of Research In Open And Distance Learning, 8(1).
Retrieved April 30, 2007 From
http://Www.Irrodl.Org/Index.Php/Irrodl/Article/Viewarticle/380/763
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why Do People Use Information
Technology? A Critical Review Of The Technology Acceptance Model.
Information & Management, 40, 191–204.
Lin, J. C., & Lu, H. (2000). Towards An Understanding Of The Behavioral Intention To
Use A Web Site. International Journal of Information Management, 20, 197–208.
Liu, S., Liao, H., & Peng, C. (2005). Applying The Technology Acceptance Model And
Flow Theory To Online E-learning Users’ Acceptance Behavior. Issues In
Information Systems, 6(2), 175–181.
Malhotra, Y., & Galletta, D. F. (1999). Extending The Technology Acceptance Model
To Account For Social Influence: Theoretical bases and Empirical Validation.
Proceedings Of The 32nd Hawaii International Conference On System Sciences,
Marsh, H. W, Balla, J. R., & Macdonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-Of-Fit Indexes In
Confirmatory Factor Analysis: The Effect Of Sample Size. Psychological
Bulletin, 88, 245–258.
Mungania, P., & Reio, Jr. T. G. (2005). If E-Learners Get There, Will They Stay? The
Role Of E-learning Self-Efficacy. Eric Ed492287. Paper Presented At The
Academy Of Human Resource Development International Conference (AHRD),
Estes Park, CO, Feb 24–27, 2005, P. 1110–1117 (Symp. 48–2).
Ndubisi, N. O. (2006). Factors Of Online Learning Adoption: A Comparative
Juxtaposition Of The Theory of Planned Behavior And The Technology
Acceptance Model. International Journal On E-learning, 5(4), 571–591.
Newcomb, M. D. (1992). What Structural Equation Modeling Can Tell Us About Social
Support. In I. G. Sarason, B. R. Sarason, & G.
R. Pierce (Eds.), Social Support: An Interactional View. (Pp. 26–63). New York: John
Wiley & Sons
Park, S. Y. (2009). An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in
Understanding University Students' Behavioral Intention to Use e-learning.
Journal of Educational Technology & Society , Vol. 12, No. 3, Technology
Support for Self-Organized Learners (July 2009), pp. 150-162
Pituch, K.A, & Lee, Y.-K. (2006). The Influence Of System Characteristics On Elearning
Use. Computers Education, 47, 222–244.
Saadé, R. G. (2003). Web-Based Education Information System For Enhanced
Learning, EISL: Student Assessment. Journal of Information Technology
Education, 2, 267–277.
Saadé, R. G., Nebebe, F., & Tan, W. (2007). Viability Of The Technology Acceptance
Model In Multimedia Learning Environments: Comparative Study.
Interdisciplinary Journal Of Knowledge And Learning Objects, 37, 175–184.
Selim, H. M. (2003). An Empirical Investigation of Student Acceptance Of Course Web
Sites. Computers & Education, 40, 343–360.
Sobel, M. E. (1987). Direct And Indirect Effects In Linear Structural Equation Models.
Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 155–176.
Surry, D. W., Ensminger, D. C., And Haab, M. (2005). A Model For Integrating
Instructional Technology Into Higher Education. British Journal Of Educational
Technology, 36(2), 327–329.
Thong, J. Y. L., Hong, W., Tam, K. (2002). Understanding User Acceptance Of Digital
Libraries: What Are The Roles Of Interface Characteristics, Organizational
Context, And Individual Differences? International Journal Of Human-Computer
Studies, 57, 215–242
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A Model Of The Antecedents Of Perceived Ease
Of Use: Development And Test. Decision Sciences, 27, 451–481.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A Theoretical Extension Of The Technology
Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Filed Studies. Management Science, 46,
–204.
Yi, M., & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predicting The Use Of Web-Based Information Systems:
Self-Efficacy, Enjoyment, Learning Goal Orientation, And The Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal Of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 431–
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.